Contact Robert Melton, Esq. or submit a business inquiry online.
Attorney-Client Privilege
-
Tax Teams and AI Privilege: Why There Is Still No Bright-Line Rule
- October 20, 2026
- Posted by: allan
- Categories: AI & Technology Law, Tax & Compliance
No Comments
-
AI-Generated Documents and Work Product Protection: The 2026 Federal Court Split
- October 15, 2026
- Posted by: allan
- Categories: AI & Technology Law, Business Law
Two federal courts reached opposite conclusions in February 2026 on whether using AI tools in litigation waives work product protection. This post breaks down the Warner and Heppner decisions and offers practical guidance for structuring AI use to maximize protection.
-
Enterprise vs. Public AI Tools: Why the Distinction Is Now a Legal Privilege Issue
- October 14, 2026
- Posted by: allan
- Category: AI & Technology Law
The Heppner ruling established that the enterprise-versus-public AI distinction is not just a security question — it is a legal privilege question. The contractual terms governing your AI tools may determine whether your legal strategy is protected or discoverable.
-
The Heppner Ruling: When Using AI Can Waive Attorney-Client Privilege
- October 13, 2026
- Posted by: allan
- Category: AI & Technology Law
Judge Rakoff’s ruling in United States v. Heppner — the first federal decision on AI and attorney-client privilege — establishes that using a public AI platform to develop legal strategy destroys confidentiality and forfeits privilege protection.
-
AI Board Minutes and Corporate Records: Discovery, Privilege, and Governance Risks
- October 10, 2026
- Posted by: allan
- Categories: AI & Technology Law, Business Law
AI-powered meeting tools capture board deliberations with unprecedented fidelity — but that same fidelity creates serious discovery, privilege, and governance risks that most companies have not yet addressed.
-
Shadow AI in the Workplace: Recording Consent, Privilege Waiver, and Trade Secret Risks
- September 2, 2026
- Posted by: allan
- Categories: AI & Technology Law, Data Privacy & Cybersecurity, Employment Law, Intellectual Property
Employees using unauthorized AI notetakers and consumer-tier AI tools create overlapping legal exposures for employers — from recording consent violations and privilege waiver to trade secret compromise and spoliation risk. This post explains each risk and what a compliant AI workplace policy must address.
-
AI Notetakers and Recording Tools in the Enterprise: Wiretapping, Consent, Privilege, and Retention
- August 29, 2026
- Posted by: allan
- Categories: AI & Technology Law, Data Privacy & Cybersecurity
AI meeting recorders are now standard enterprise tools, but the legal risks — federal and state wiretapping exposure, attorney-client privilege waiver, trade secret leakage, and data retention liability — are far more serious than most organizations recognize. This post covers the full legal landscape and what corporate policies must address.
-
COPPA 2025: Biometric Data, AI Tools, and New Compliance Obligations for Children’s Products
The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has governed how companies collect and handle children’s online data since 1998. For most of its history, COPPA’s core requirements were relatively static: get verifiable parental consent before collecting personal information from children under 13, give parents notice and access rights, and do not retain the data longer than
November 11, 2026 Read more -
AI Recommendation Algorithms and Children’s Online Safety: Age-Appropriate Design Laws
If you build or operate a digital product that children use — a social media platform, a gaming app, an educational service, a content streaming site — a wave of state laws now requires you to redesign how your AI recommendation and content amplification systems work for minor users. These laws do not merely add
November 10, 2026 Read more -
The Take It Down Act: Platform Compliance Requirements for AI-Generated Deepfake Intimate Imagery
The internet has made it devastatingly easy to publish intimate images of another person without their consent. AI has made it even easier to create those images from scratch — no real photograph required. A convincingly realistic deepfake of a real, identifiable person in a sexual situation can now be generated in minutes, uploaded in
November 9, 2026 Read more -
Comparing Neural Data Privacy Laws: What Companies Operating Across States Must Know
If your company collects brainwave data, neural signals, or other information generated by measuring human nervous system activity, you are operating in the middle of a patchwork of conflicting state laws — and the patchwork is still being assembled. Four states — Colorado, California, Montana, and Connecticut — have enacted neural data privacy statutes with
November 8, 2026 Read more
